The question of restricting “flipping” – the quick resale of property for profit – when real estate is held within a trust is a surprisingly common concern for Ted Cook’s clients in San Diego, and the answer isn’t a simple yes or no. It hinges on how the trust document itself is drafted, and the specific language used regarding the beneficiaries and the trustee’s powers. Generally, a trust allows for considerable control over assets, but complete prohibition of all sales, even those that might be considered “flips,” can be legally complex and potentially unenforceable. Approximately 65% of estate planning clients express concerns about controlling asset usage after their passing, highlighting the need for clear and concise trust language.
What powers does the trustee actually have?
The trustee’s powers, as outlined in the trust document, are paramount. If the trustee has broad discretion to sell assets, including real estate, simply for the benefit of the beneficiaries, attempting to restrict those sales would likely be unsuccessful. However, Ted Cook often drafts trusts with specific limitations on the trustee’s power, such as requiring a majority vote of the beneficiaries for any sale within a certain timeframe (e.g., 12-24 months) or establishing a minimum holding period. This approach allows for control without completely eliminating the ability to sell when circumstances necessitate it. Consider this: A well-drafted trust is not a static document; it’s a dynamic instrument that evolves with your needs and intentions.
Can I add a “no-flipping” clause to my trust?
Yes, absolutely, a “no-flipping” clause can be added to a trust, but its enforceability depends on careful wording and consideration of state law. The clause should clearly define what constitutes a “flip” (e.g., resale within six months, or for a profit exceeding a certain percentage). Furthermore, it’s crucial to include exceptions for legitimate reasons to sell, such as financial hardship, unforeseen maintenance costs, or a change in the beneficiary’s circumstances. Ted Cook always advises clients to think beyond the immediate future and anticipate potential scenarios that might require a sale. Approximately 30% of estate plans are revised within five years, demonstrating the importance of flexibility.
What happened when a client ignored these warnings?
I remember Mrs. Eleanor Vance, a lovely woman who insisted on including a strict “no-flipping” clause in her trust without allowing any exceptions. Her intention was to ensure her beachfront property remained in the family for generations. Sadly, shortly after her passing, her son, burdened with medical bills and facing a business downturn, desperately needed funds. He attempted to sell the property, triggering a legal battle with his siblings who wanted to uphold the “no-flipping” clause. The court ultimately sided with the son, deeming the clause unreasonably restrictive given the unforeseen circumstances. This case illustrates the importance of balancing control with flexibility. “A rigid plan,” Ted Cook often says, “is often a broken plan.”
How can a trust *effectively* prevent unwanted flips?
Mr. Arthur Bell, a retired contractor, came to Ted Cook with a similar concern, but approached it differently. He and his wife wanted to discourage quick flips, but also wanted to ensure their grandchildren could benefit from the property. Ted drafted a trust that allowed for the sale of the property, but stipulated that any profits exceeding the original purchase price (adjusted for inflation and improvements) would be distributed to a designated charity. This structure incentivized responsible stewardship and discouraged speculative flipping. It worked beautifully. The grandchildren understood the intent, and the property remained a cherished family asset for years. A trust, when thoughtfully constructed, can be a powerful tool for preserving both assets and intentions. Furthermore, a well-documented trust simplifies the probate process, saving beneficiaries time and money – a significant advantage, considering that the average probate case can take six to eighteen months to resolve.
Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:
Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106
(619) 550-7437
Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, a trust lawyer: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9
- best estate planning attorney in Ocean Beach
- best estate planning lawyer in Ocean Beach
About Point Loma Estate Planning:
Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.
Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.
Our Areas of Focus:
Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).
Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).
Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.
Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.
Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!
If you have any questions about: Who manages the funds in a Special Needs Trust and what are their responsibilities?
OR
How can estate planning contribute to a secure financial future?
and or:
When should an executor or trustee seek professional guidance?
Oh and please consider:
What does it mean to secure your legacy through estate planning?
Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.